from the edge

Showing posts with label love of God. Show all posts
Showing posts with label love of God. Show all posts

Tuesday, 22 August 2017

Black Dog

There is a French saying ne pas être dans son assiete, which roughly translates as ‘to not be fully in one’s own plate’, as when pasta, badly served, overspills onto the table. It’s a great way of describing the general sense of being all over the place which I think many of us experience from time to time. It is not something we can easily ‘snap out of’, as sufferers of anxiety and depression, in all its manifestations, will know. Not being fully in one’s plate is a debilitating state of mind, especially if you are a writer, teacher, or someone tasked with preaching sermons or providing leadership.

There are other names for this state of mind, like ‘writer’s block’ or ‘black dog’, not that the two are identical, but they invariably feed on each other. I find they do the same in the course of the average day, since all days are potentially creative, whatever kind of work we do. Things get put off when we are blocked. We feel tired. We live for that cup of coffee, or something worse. We are not fully in control. There is something random and anarchic about the way we go about the day and the way we apply our thinking, if we are able to think at all. At the same time, we are absolutely static, inwardly ‘blocked’, so that there is not even the dubious thrill of the roller coaster effect, teetering on the creative high before plummeting to the depths.

The way we are feeling prevents us from doing anything specific. It paralyses, and makes it impossible to do what, theoretically, we should do in order to get back on track and motor forward. There are different methods for achieving this forward momentum. Personally, I find that methods only work for a while, and that when they no longer work you are back on your own, dealing with the black dog, or with writer’s block, or with the inability to dream up a sermon if that is what is required of you.

I have slowly learned that what is needed in all of these situations is a deep and inexhaustible energy in which we can trust, something which we can draw on simply by owning our desire and need for it. Whatever work we do, but especially if it is creative work, we must continually return to its creative source.

But this is impossible if we have not first learned to accept and believe in ourselves as gifted, or fruitful, full of life and hope even if, right now, it feels that we have ground to a complete halt. Knowing ourselves as fruitful is not the same as feeling reassured by relative success. Success will often come at the price of the work itself, because to be sure of success means being willing to think of one’s work as a commodity designed to satisfy consumers and fit the mood of the moment. This is as true in the context of preaching sermons as it is in any other creative work.  In our own low moments it is tempting to simply generate the kind of work, or preach the kind of sermons, which will satisfy the criteria for success or popularity. But we may end up hating ourselves for doing so, and then hate the work.

We are only fruitful when we write or say what gives people permission to flourish as the persons they were created to be. We are fruitful when we free others into their gifts so that they can use those gifts, and their lives, in the service of the truth which makes us free. For this to be possible, we have to trust our own giftedness enough to wait on it, even in the depths of depression and self doubt, because it is often there that we meet people and offer them hope in their own dark depths. We offer them hope because we have visited the depths ourselves.  We have learned to forgive and accept ourselves there, so we are in a position to help others do the same.

A good way to begin this process of self acceptance is to get into the habit of returning to any period, or even a single moment, in our life when we knew ourselves to be utterly valued, that our very existence was a blessing to someone else. It is important to re-own such moments without feeling guilty that we are doing so, because guilt is itself a denial of love.

Loving and forgiving one’s self is the hardest kind of loving there is, especially if you have not been equipped for it in early life. It is often much easier to remain in the depths of depression and self doubt, simply because they are familiar depths, whereas acceptance and forgiveness open up new horizons, new roads to travel into the unknown. The unknown is frightening because discovering it will inevitably involve getting to know ourselves as we really are, and accept our giftedness. We are gifted in and through the love of God from whom all energy for creative work, and life itself, proceeds.



Wednesday, 25 November 2015

A word in season

Speaking as someone tasked with preaching sermons, Sunday’s texts did not fit the mood of the moment. Last Sunday’s texts would have been better. Last Sunday's texts spoke of nation rising against nation, of wars and rumours of wars, prompting thoughts about the ‘end times’ which might have better reflected the recent events in Paris, and better served the less imaginative preacher.

The power of suggestion is great but it is not always good for preaching. It can take the preacher, and their listeners, into a kind of spiritual cul-de-sac, a place you know you have visited before, and where you found nothing which could take you or your listeners any further on your journey, so that the only option left is to reverse back to where you started from. This is difficult unless you have an idea of when the words were said and what specific events they were referring to.

When it comes to the ‘end times’, history has had plenty of them. There have been plagues, famines, wars, earthquakes and other cataclysmic disasters since before anything was ever recorded in words. But perhaps the biblical texts which depict end-time scenarios are, nevertheless, helpful. They can serve as a kind of purge for collective fear. As we read them, we can tell ourselves that all this happened before, but here we still are, and here we will remain, regardless of global terrorism and ad hoc missile responses to the recent horrific events in Paris.

This Sunday’s text was the feeding of the five thousand. The lectionary, which is the selection of scripture passages appointed to be read in churches on a particular Sunday, has moved on, even if the mood of the moment remains the same.  The story is appointed to be read on the last Sunday of the Church’s year, on the feast of Christ the King, just before the beginning of Advent. In this story, we are faced with the end-times again but in an entirely different way. The crowd, now healed and fed, thinks of Jesus as ‘the prophet who is to come’. They want to make Jesus a king, but he will have none of it.

The story is a cameo moment, a memory which never fades. Cameo moments are full of small but unforgettable details, such as the people being told to sit down in groups on the ‘green grass’, the disciples wondering how they are going to feed five thousand people with five loaves and two fish, Christ blessing these morsels of food and instructing his disciples to distribute them, and the twelve baskets filled with leftovers because nothing must go to waste, ‘nothing must be lost’.

The fear which many of us carry around at the moment, in the aftermath of the Paris massacre, has to do with the possibility of loss. We speak of our values and way of life being threatened, which is probably an exaggeration and not what matters most. The greatest loss would be a state of final separation from the love of God, something which cannot happen unless a person consciously wills it. No ruler or movement, however evil, can oblige an entire nation to consciously reject that love. In fact, the greater the evil, the more the love of God seems to manifest itself in the hearts and minds of human beings, as we saw with those who resisted the Nazis and those who danced and sang in the Place de la République at 9.20pm on Friday, exactly a week after the massacre.


I do not think that it is possible to consciously will a final separation from the love of God while still loving other human beings. The story of the feeding of the five thousand, placed in the context of the aftermath of the Paris massacre, speaks of people wanting others to connect with this love. It speaks of human love as much as it speaks of God’s love. People had followed Jesus all day, perhaps bringing friends or relatives who were suffering from physical or mental illness and who may or may not have thought that he could do much to help them. But in that cameo moment they would have known that they were held in the impregnable fortress of God’s love. We need to know this too.