As I walk the fields around my house on this clear, cold
and stunningly beautiful afternoon, I am reminded that God promises to those
who love him something like the joy I am experiencing. I also know, as I watch
the doggish joy of our Labradoodle who is hurtling towards the bushes at the
far end of the field, where squirrels are bound to be, that this joy is universal.
Somehow, the dog, in his doggishness, experiences the joy implicit in the
promise made to those who love God; ‘what no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor
the human heart conceived’ (1Cor.2:9)
I also know that others walking these fields may have
quite different feelings, feelings which have nothing to do with joy. This
knowledge concerns me, because the situation seems unfair. Loving God is, after
all, a gift in itself, and God, we are told, does not have favourites. So how
is it that some can soar to such heights of joy in the seeming ordinariness of
walking a dog while others may remain indifferent to the moment, or are simply
burdened by sadness? I have known such sadness myself when walking the fields, sadness
attributable to life, the state of the world, or to nothing in particular. I
have tried to be joyful in these moments and failed. Mindful of the suffering
of millions, I have also tried to be less joyful in those other moments. Again,
I have failed.
All of this pertains to the way we think about Lent. Is Lent
a season which permits joy? Or is it one for moderating our response to the
blessings of life? Many of us tend to do the latter for much of the time, because
we like to be taken seriously and serious people do not run down hills exulting
in the joy of the moment.
I think there is something almost blasphemous in refusing
joy, and in the idea that joy is somehow unseemly in Lent, because joy is of
God himself. To be joyful is to allow ourselves to be taken out of the emotional
straight jacket we wear for much of the time so that our constricted selves can
be blessed by the love of God. To refuse such moments amounts to telling God
that we know what is best for us better than God does. Such knowledge, and the will to implement it,
amounts to what used to be known as pride, another of the cardinal sins, for
which see a previous blog post.
Pride is about control, the control of other people or
animals, and the unforgiving self control which tells us that we can manage our
own salvation. The salvation offered to us by God in Christ consists in the
freedom to be joyful. It is almost a condition for salvation itself. We are to ‘rejoice
in the Lord always’ (Phil.4:4). Rejoicing in the Lord will inevitably involve
loss of control, or the surrendering of what we think will make others,
including God, take us seriously.
Here, there is a paradox. It lies in the Cross, which was
the most serious event in all time but which consisted in God allowing himself
to be shamed, to be not taken seriously. In the Cross and in its shame, we are taken
seriously as the flawed and fragile human beings that we really are, human
beings who believe that their fragility and imperfection can be strengthened or
remedied through the kind of self control which makes us resistant to
forgiveness.
The need to control stems from the fear of being
forgiven. Forgiveness brings freedom from old ways of thinking about life,
about other human beings and about God. It frees us into new and wide open
spaces, in which we see the world and creation in a new way. It is a cause for
joy.
No comments:
Post a Comment