Last week I attended one of those 24 hour brainstorming
events in which the real work of organisations often gets done. Modern Church www.modernchurch.org.uk is a
hospitable context in which the Christian faith can be discussed with
intelligence, integrity and, most importantly, charity. What is most striking
about Modern Church as an organisation is not so much that it is modern, but
that its gatherings give shape and substance to the idea of what it means to be
Church. Put theologically, this means that it serves the interests of its
members, and the purpose of its founding ethos, by being clear about its liberal
identity, an identity which is held within that of the wider Church.
Modern Church is also clear about its basic objectives. It is modern and liberal , which does not
prevent it being rooted in Christ, something which is clearly reflected in the
regularity and depth of its worship. Ultimately, all that goes on in this
organisation is held together in worship which sustains the bonds of affection
(to borrow a quintessentially Anglican phrase) and holds Modern Church within
the greater love of God.
God’s love also moves the organisation’s intellectual
life in a continual forward direction, so there is depth and dynamic to its
overall life of community. This in turn gives rise to what we call hope. In its
organisational life, hope is not about hanging in and hoping for the best for
Modern Church, specifically for the next generation of members who will carry
its vision forward into the future. It is about having faith in that future and
that the organisation is already, in some measure, living in it. Its members know
this because there is a sense of the already and the ‘not yet’ in Modern
Church’s intellectual life and in its internal relations. There are occasional
strong disagreements but we sense that these too are ‘held’ within that same
over-arching love, and ‘moved’ forward in its dynamic, so its organisational
life has a certain vibrancy to it, which is what will ultimately attract new
and younger members.
All of this has something to say to the wider ‘institutional’
Church, mainly because the Church is increasingly thought of as an institution in
decline, perhaps because it tries too hard at being a viable organisation. In
attempting to remain viable, the Church’s life is becoming systematised to the
extent that it is losing sight of what it is really about which is making the
love of God in Jesus Christ a reality to be experienced by people in their
lives today. The Church cannot do this by remaining in the past.
In the Church in
Wales, where I come from, despite the real efforts being made to engage with
all of its members in new and creative ways, the Church is still fearful of
change. Fear of change is most keenly felt in its internal relations, especially
with regard to women’s ministry and the proper deployment of their gifts. As a
result of this fear, and the distrust which it brings, hearts are growing
increasingly cold. This coldness is often reflected in the ‘thinness’ of much
of the Church’s worship, teaching and sociality. There is something not quite
true about it, not quite believable.
Something is
getting in the way of the Church’s relationship with God as his people. It suggests
that cold hearts and systems which are geared to minimize change do not make
for a vibrant Christian community. The Church is called to be the visible
presence of Christ in the world as a vibrant worshipping community, but this
cannot happen where there is fear and distrust, because fear and distrust legitimise
cronyism which in turn restricts the dynamic and re-creative movement of the
Holy Spirit within tightly controlled male clerical circles. This blocks the
forward movement of the Holy Spirit towards a new life for the Church of the
future, so the Church has less and less to offer in the way of hope for the world,
or even for its own life. As a result, its life gets reduced to a system for getting
things done or, as is often the case, not done. Perhaps the Church needs more of the slightly fuzzy edged clarity which comes when organisations manage to hold
on to their vision, to their objective, in valuing those bonds of affection which
enable them to be Christ in the world as well as to one another. Perhaps it is
time for the system to change.
No comments:
Post a Comment